A lot of people have been asking me what it takes to get into a VC firm. Few pointers:
- At an analyst level, most firms are looking for smart people, perhaps with some background in equity analysis or business analysis. It is not unusual to have fresh MBAs with some pre-MBA work experience to be considered.
- Different firms have different views on whether analyst position is a career track position or not. A lot of firms see this as a 2-3 year relationships. Some firms believe that analysts can graduate into leading investments.
- At a senior level, different firms look for different profiles. Somewhat later stage focussed firms are happy to look at people from equity and business analysis, consulting or investment banking backgrounds. A lot of early stage firms tend to want prior entrepreneurial or strong operating backgrounds. There are no simple rules here.
- VC business is a highly reference driven business, and there are very few openings. So make the right approach and engage early in the cycle.
- Different firms have very different formal and informal decision structures – understand them well before you jump in.
Many VC firms are setting up their presence in India, and hence there are perhaps more opportunities than would exist in stable state. Amongst the US venture firms, there are two approaches. Some firms want people to join in US, work there for a year or two, do a couple of deals by travelling down, and then take a call on whether they want a full time person in India. Other firms, such as Canaan, look for people who have the network and operating/entrepreneurial experience in India to directly be part of the India team.
Latest posts by Alok Mittal (see all)
- Promoters or Entrepreneurs – A choice for Private Equity players - August 3, 2019
- Startup Marathon Mindset - March 25, 2019
- What’s your Customer Culture? - March 4, 2019
Some of you guys may find these two posts interesting:
http://global-themes.com/how-to-become-a-vc/ and
http://global-themes.com/so-you-want-to-be-a-vc/
“Start a company – have a 100 mio USD exit (even 10 would do).”
Hmm.. sounds easy.. I am sure its tough 😉 ( by mio I think you mean million )
I agree to your earlier point that we learn a lot from our mistakes.
I have always seen MBA making people risk averse. Is that true or am I wrong? One of the reasons I have been delaying MBA .
Mohit,
Unfortunately we are a country of 1.2 billion people. And growing. While this makes us the biggest market of the future – it becomes very difficult to find talent.
We might have more talented people than any other country in absolute terms – but finding them is TOUGH. And getting tougher. Combine this with HR practises which are dubious (to say the least) then we have screeners like the JEE, CAT etc.
I graduated last year from an IIM, and I have seen all kinds of people there. But some of the most brilliant people I have seen are not my MBA pals. They are people who I met during my BTech, people who I have worked with during my 2.5 years before my MBA.
But in a country as big as India, we tend to use objective parameters (the double danda II being one). And many people thus lose out.
But they have an option – Start a company – have a 100 mio USD exit (even 10 would do). Then your CV is worth more than wannabe MBA grads who spend their days staring at Bloomberg screens – Like ME. 🙂
And I would say that there are analysts in VC firms without MBAs. But I am not sure how much of a partner track your on from there.
Nice information Rajesh.
I was thinking about Alok’s statement “most firms are looking for smart people, perhaps with some background in equity analysis or business analysis”. Doest smart people include MBAs only. ? May be one of the members can clarify this.
Mohit,
Its always said that we learn more from our failures than our successes. In that case I dont see any problems with having a failed venture – as long as he has given a shot. But a successful venture will always increase your marketability to both the existing GPs/LPs and prospective investees.
Pradyoth,
There is a path called EIR (Entrepreneur in Residence) which usually means that the entrepreneur will operate (along with his team) from/near the VC digs. He could help evaluate other investees which come for funding. Once his venture gets bigger, he moves on. Alternately, if he is not involved in anything at the mom, he moves into an investee company at a CXO. As you can see, this is a very valued role and its very difficult to land. I am not sure if any of the Indian VC firms have such a role/are open to it. 🙂
Old Hand,
Brilliant post.
And Alok,
Yes yes…please..tell us how lucrative is being a VC in India. Just joking mate. And its not all about money is it.
Bankers/Consultants want to be in PE/VC. VCs want to be entrepreneurs. Entreprenurs dream of being children forever – something like a peter pan complex. And you know what kids want to do. Be bankers and consultants. 🙂
Sorry for the winded post.