I have seen this cycle happen over and over again. There would be a set of guys who’d be around in most barcamps and social circles and someday they’d decide to start a company, and eventually build a product that’d gain quite a bit of traction from the “first adopters” that you find in barcamps, MoMos etc and then the worst thing happens – they get funded.
I have stats that show that more than 80% of companies whose growth and traction flatten out after getting funded by a VC firm. I’m asking myself the question if the founders were such shrewed and capable executioners that they planned the entire stunt just so that the popularity lasts till they get funded – but I doubt thats the case. So what then?
I came across a note where someone mentioned that people who get funded barely go back to the social circles after that. Partly cause those circles disown them because of whatever has happened to them. VC funding is not the golden egg, its more of the long-term, high interest, loan that is given to a company hoping that it would make it big, but for most folks getting funded is the end goal and such folks starts treating companies that have gotten funding as if they are Cinderella’s step sisters. The welcome is not there anymore, and there is no reason for these founders to go back to those circles anymore. They retire to the boring life of going out to meet peeps in baristas and coffee days where more pleasantries are exchanged than the actual meaning or weight of words.
This is actually very bad news. For the funded startup its very much so cause these early adopters essentially have dropped a baby on its head, just when someone agreed that it had potential. For the rest of the community, its also very bad since its a loss of a resource who probably had figured out how things work here and most certainly had knowledge worth sharing.
If you think I am just randomly spewing out stuff, I’ll make the entire point with one reference. J’lo’s single titled “I’m still Jenny from the Block”. That pretty much drives the point across. When your folks on the block are essentially who your early adopters are, and they disown you, it becomes radically hard for your company to survive without burning hard cold cash to see if someone would take you in for some cash in return. In the language of the hood, there is no love from the brothers no more.
I for one think that VC firms should stop advertising the amount they invested. Startups that get funded should make this a mandatory point with their investors. I know quite a few firms, like Ixigo for example who have gotten funding, yet not knowing the amount keeps things quiet, calm and life still goes on. Take any company that you know of [ and probably hate ], saying millions have been funded and crazy things like that and all of a sudden I am wondering if someone “deserves” that sorta valuation. Everybody thinks or says it out loud that its unfair and a lot of enmity grows in this little pool for absolutely no reason whatsoever.
Some companies would claim that announcing the investment amount adds credibility that will get you clients. Who are we really kidding? When you are small you need to embrace your brotherhood close to your heart and they will be your first set of customers whether you like it or not. An enterprise is a hard sell and probably is only worth aiming at when you are looking at your second round. If it happens, I’d be extremely happy but do be prepared to know and realize that your first set of customers are all folks you know, startups and SMEs. By the second round, you’d have grown to a much different positioning and would also have the strength to stand on your feet that you’d survive, and also would have weaned off the support system by then.
Until then, make no mistake, you need your community and the community needs you. Some things being in secret will make that happen.
Note: The media loves to flaunt numbers. So if you are not going to disclose numbers, don’t be surprised if they don’t run your story. Its okay, they too need to evolve, understand and adapt.
A Repost from the Author’s Personal Blog, The Startup Guy.
- Launching an Experiment to Spot Problems Worth Solving - November 2, 2015
- Introducing In50hrs Healthcare Edition - May 14, 2014
- Ideas Pitched / Prototyped at In50hrs Pune 5 - September 16, 2013
Banibrata,
I totally agree with you.
This post strikes a strong chord… and can relate. IMHO, your observations are quite true, but inferences — as to what the reasons of the behaviour are, may not be 100% correct. I don’t think that the community disowns the funded ventures, instead the funded ventures voluntarily or in-voluntarily change their own behaviour, attitude and outlook to the community, which alienates them.
I’ve seen some “freshly funded” companies coming to community events and passing out handouts, and making strong accented speeches about “we are a well-funded company, with root in …… and we are hiring… looking for …”. I don’t think that these people are so smart after-all. Some of these community events are were everyone is either an entrepreneur themself or a wannabe… and offering them, what is seen as a measly “job” is bull-crap! It hurts the ego and alienates. Most of these target-hires are already very well placed in cushy MNC jobs, and joining another well-funded startup isn’t what they are looking for… esply. not if it’s one that was until recently, part of the fraternity.
My 2 cents,
Banibrata.
If it hurts your growth and curbs your wave half-way in between, it’s certainly a matter to worry about.
Those early adopters dump you (if at all) not because your startup got funded. They’ve never been serious to begin with. No matter how hard you try you couldn’t have possibility sustained their loyalties. They sure were feeling you up for some time but that fidgeting will not have lasted beyond the next bar camp / MoMo event where they will go after the next cool app. Serious adopters look for utility factor in your app, will recognize its value to them, keep coming back to you and will even turn evangelists. The other type you mention, are fickle brainsuckers that waste your time and walk you down the wrong road. The other merit in spreading the word is that the integrity it brings will help attract precious hard-to-get talent, mentoring support, supplier credit and with a bit of luck, some early customers (because now you look a lot more serious player and not a fly-by-night, hole-in-the-wall outfit) that often elude a startup. I remember you ranting about it earlier.
So why deny the little “celebration†yourself upon reaching that critical milestone in the life of a startup, that is as much a statement on founder commitment, viability of the business plan, competence and perceived execution capability of the team and scalability of the idea as it is about its seriousness of purpose? VCs have their skin in the game and when they make a statement by committing capital to the venture, it bears awesome credence. I sure don’t think it earns `enmity’ as you fear (not at least from people that matter), at best it could win you some admiration tinged with envy; but then that is something to gloat about than be worrying 😉
Vijay, a very interesting post. I think there are other effects of getting funded. It affects the motivational scheme of the founders (it’s not about survival anymore, it’s about how rich you’ll get eventually).
I often say that the best thing that happened to my startup was that all the VCs we talked to in 2000-2001 did not see it as an interesting project…